This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients Darren.Dale, John Hagen, benjamin.peterson, daniel.urban, docs@python, dsdale24, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ncoghlan, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach
Date 2016-12-07.00:52:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1481071970.09.0.357741057037.issue28886@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Right, these are in the "Don't use them in new code, but we have absolutely no plans to actually remove them" documentation-only category of deprecation warning.

However, I'm converting this to a documentation enhancement request, as the documentation could make that status clearer by moving them to a separate "Legacy builtin decorator subclasses" section at the end of https://docs.python.org/3/library/abc.html

Then that section can *start* with the information on simply applying the builtin decorators on top of the abc.abstractproperty() decorator, before moving on to document the available subclasses.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-12-07 00:52:50ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, stutzbach, eric.araujo, daniel.urban, docs@python, dsdale24, python-dev, eric.snow, Darren.Dale, serhiy.storchaka, John Hagen
2016-12-07 00:52:50ncoghlansetmessageid: <1481071970.09.0.357741057037.issue28886@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-12-07 00:52:50ncoghlanlinkissue28886 messages
2016-12-07 00:52:49ncoghlancreate