Message 282063 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	larry, martin.panter, mdk, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner
Date	2016-11-30.04:01:14
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1480478474.79.0.536067535396.issue28754@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> If adding proper support for hi=None, maybe lo=None should > also be supported. That would be gratuitous. Lo already has a reasonable, useful, and self-explanatory value. This would add more complexity to the signature while reducing clarity. I really don't want to see calls like bisect(arr, x, None).

> If adding proper support for hi=None, maybe lo=None should
> also be supported.

That would be gratuitous.  Lo already has a reasonable, useful, and self-explanatory value.  This would add more complexity to the signature while reducing clarity.  I really don't want to see calls like bisect(arr, x, None).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-11-30 04:01:14	rhettinger	set	recipients: + rhettinger, vstinner, larry, skrah, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, mdk
2016-11-30 04:01:14	rhettinger	set	messageid: <1480478474.79.0.536067535396.issue28754@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-11-30 04:01:14	rhettinger	link	issue28754 messages
2016-11-30 04:01:14	rhettinger	create