Message281838
Antoine: I'm still unclear on what's going on here but I noticed something by accident when trying your example script. Specifically, when I ran your script from the directory where it exists on disk, I could successfully reproduce what you described but if I ran your script from a different working directory (e.g. 'python3.5 ../tmp/issue_28779_repro.py') then I did not see the misbehavior and it instead ran through to completion without any exceptions reported. I saw this phenomenon (all that I described above) on both OSX and Ubuntu 16.04 systems.
Secondly, looking at the file you attached, did everything make it into the patch? I ask because unless I'm missing something it looks like the patch adds arguments to the function signature but does not act upon them in any new way? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-11-28 00:25:06 | davin | set | recipients:
+ davin, pitrou, sbt |
2016-11-28 00:25:05 | davin | set | messageid: <1480292705.92.0.534408558147.issue28779@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-11-28 00:25:05 | davin | link | issue28779 messages |
2016-11-28 00:25:05 | davin | create | |
|