➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients Arfrever, abarry, gvanrossum, josh.r, levkivskyi, llllllllll, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, ned.deily, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, taleinat, yselivanov
Date 2016-11-13.22:39:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJKAVyHUPDTmFoNXHe=FmewSf48uyV3v61mQnDKSxYvDXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1479070698.88.0.686929460524.issue24379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
Actually I'm with Raymond -- I'm also not sure or mildly against (-0).
Given how easy it is to do without and how cumbersome using the operator
module is I don't see a great benefit. (IMO the operator module should be
the measure of *last* resort -- it is not to become part of anybody's
toolkit for common operators. But I seem to be a minority opinion here.)
History
Date User Action Args
2016-11-13 22:39:32gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, taleinat, ned.deily, Arfrever, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, python-dev, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, josh.r, llllllllll, levkivskyi, abarry
2016-11-13 22:39:32gvanrossumlinkissue24379 messages
2016-11-13 22:39:32gvanrossumcreate