Author pydanny
Recipients Omer.Katz, alex, carljm, eric.araujo, madison.may, ncoghlan, pitrou, pydanny, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2016-11-11.20:28:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1478896119.47.0.197185379063.issue21145@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm delighted to see a patch submitted, but I'm concerned that it isn't thread safe. This was implemented in the cached-property package I maintain:

* https://github.com/pydanny/cached-property/issues/6
* https://github.com/pydanny/cached-property/pull/9
* https://github.com/pydanny/cached-property#working-with-threads
History
Date User Action Args
2016-11-11 20:28:39pydannysetrecipients: + pydanny, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, carljm, eric.araujo, alex, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, madison.may, Omer.Katz
2016-11-11 20:28:39pydannysetmessageid: <1478896119.47.0.197185379063.issue21145@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-11-11 20:28:39pydannylinkissue21145 messages
2016-11-11 20:28:39pydannycreate