Message279322
Hi Serhiy,
thanks for the feedback.
"+ def tk_busy(self, **kw):
Shouldn't it be just an alias to tk_busy_hold?"
Not sure, I figured since it is a separate command in tk I would make it a separate command in Python, too.
"+ def tk_busy_hold(self, **kw):
Since the only supported option is cursor, just declare it.
def tk_busy_hold(self, cursor=None):
"
I thought so at first, too, but is this really wise, since if future versions of tk add other options another patch would be required? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-10-24 17:45:45 | klappnase | set | recipients:
+ klappnase, serhiy.storchaka, tkinter, GNJ |
2016-10-24 17:45:45 | klappnase | set | messageid: <1477331145.42.0.403048417301.issue28498@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-10-24 17:45:45 | klappnase | link | issue28498 messages |
2016-10-24 17:45:45 | klappnase | create | |
|