Message 277186 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	steven.daprano
Recipients	brett.cannon, fijall, lemburg, ned.deily, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner
Date	2016-09-22.00:12:00
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<20160922001136.GW22471@ando.pearwood.info>
In-reply-to	<57E2D2EB.8080209@egenix.com>

Content
> I'd suggest to display all values and base the findings on > all available values, rather than just one: > min, max, avg, median, stddev. If we're going to go down that path, I suggest using something like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-number_summary But at this point, we're surely looking at 3.7?

> I'd suggest to display all values and base the findings on
> all available values, rather than just one:
> min, max, avg, median, stddev.

If we're going to go down that path, I suggest using something like:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-number_summary

But at this point, we're surely looking at 3.7?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-09-22 00:12:01	steven.daprano	set	recipients: + steven.daprano, lemburg, tim.peters, brett.cannon, pitrou, vstinner, ned.deily, fijall, serhiy.storchaka
2016-09-22 00:12:00	steven.daprano	link	issue28240 messages
2016-09-22 00:12:00	steven.daprano	create