➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Jim.Jewett
Recipients Denny Weinberg, Jim.Jewett, Roman.Evstifeev, ammar2, belopolsky, christian.heimes, josh.r, ncoghlan, palm.kevin
Date 2016-09-21.21:29:42
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1474493382.64.0.340842765206.issue27400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Having to (re-)fill the cache once per interpreter seems like a reasonable price to pay.

Why is 3.5 not included?  Did this not cause problems before the import change, or is it just that this bug is small enough that maybe it isn't worth backporting?
History
Date User Action Args
2016-09-21 21:29:42Jim.Jewettsetrecipients: + Jim.Jewett, ncoghlan, belopolsky, christian.heimes, palm.kevin, Roman.Evstifeev, josh.r, Denny Weinberg, ammar2
2016-09-21 21:29:42Jim.Jewettsetmessageid: <1474493382.64.0.340842765206.issue27400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-09-21 21:29:42Jim.Jewettlinkissue27400 messages
2016-09-21 21:29:42Jim.Jewettcreate