➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients christian.heimes, paul.moore, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware
Date 2016-09-14.15:19:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1473866377.6.0.531905202616.issue28126@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> They might get a tiny bit faster on Windows, if they have used Py_MEMCPY() for up to 16 bytes

Even that's unlikely as the loop in the macro would have been unrolled in practically every case.

This is about removing an unnecessary macro. Certainly no API change unless we delete it entirely (which I'm okay with), and IMHO if it has an issue number it should go in NEWS. Maybe build is the right section?
History
Date User Action Args
2016-09-14 15:19:37steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, paul.moore, vstinner, christian.heimes, tim.golden, python-dev, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka
2016-09-14 15:19:37steve.dowersetmessageid: <1473866377.6.0.531905202616.issue28126@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-09-14 15:19:37steve.dowerlinkissue28126 messages
2016-09-14 15:19:37steve.dowercreate