Author vstinner
Recipients docs@python, flox, lemburg, pitrou, python-dev, vstinner
Date 2016-09-14.13:20:48
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAMpsgwZjUPYcNbsh0sHL2_WbO559XTUMn7bFvBfhabauFHzBVg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1473794840.69.0.316221750505.issue15369@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I'd also like to request that you reword this dismissive line in the performance package's readme: (...)

Please report issues of the performance module on its own bug tracker:
https://github.com/python/performance

Can you please propose a new description? You might even create a pull
request ;-)

Note: I'm not sure that we should keep pybench, this benchmark really
looks unreliable. But I should still try at least to use the same
number of iterations for all worker child processes. Currently the
calibration is done in each child process.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-09-14 13:20:48vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, lemburg, pitrou, flox, docs@python, python-dev
2016-09-14 13:20:48vstinnerlinkissue15369 messages
2016-09-14 13:20:48vstinnercreate