➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steven.daprano
Recipients mark.dickinson, martin.panter, ned.deily, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2016-09-12.03:07:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1473649640.1.0.564489454766.issue27761@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
As discussed with Ned via email, this issue shouldn't affect the public geometric_function and the failing tests (currently skipped) are too strict.  The existing tests demand an unrealistic precision which should be loosened,  e.g. from assertEqual to assertAlmostEqual. Ned wrote:

"If you are only planning to make changes to the tests themselves, I think that can wait for b2."

I am currently unable to build 3.6, and I won't have time to resolve that before b1.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-09-12 03:07:20steven.dapranosetrecipients: + steven.daprano, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, ned.deily, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2016-09-12 03:07:20steven.dapranosetmessageid: <1473649640.1.0.564489454766.issue27761@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-09-12 03:07:20steven.dapranolinkissue27761 messages
2016-09-12 03:07:19steven.dapranocreate