Author gvanrossum
Recipients doko, gvanrossum, koobs, ned.deily, python-dev, vstinner, xdegaye, zach.ware
Date 2016-09-10.01:44:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJKU1rpkCPQOn+dB1V_YFsOVxV7kTBQs_aC4mEakGusunA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1473469186.03.0.155976623269.issue28027@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
The modules should remain deleted for 3.6b1 so we can see if there are
actually any complaints -- if we get any we can consider restoring
them for b2. I fail to be convinced by the arguments against deletion
brought up so far -- the "evidence" produced is way too thin to
matter.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-09-10 01:44:14gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, doko, vstinner, ned.deily, xdegaye, python-dev, zach.ware, koobs
2016-09-10 01:44:14gvanrossumlinkissue28027 messages
2016-09-10 01:44:14gvanrossumcreate