➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients benjamin.peterson, martin.panter, vstinner
Date 2016-09-06.00:42:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1473122545.43.0.438374635308.issue27961@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Python/pytime.c of Python 3.5 requires a 64-bit integer type and Py_LONG_LONG. Nobody complains, so I'm in favor of dropping all these annoying HAVE_LONG_LONG and just use directly Py_LONG_LONG. It should simplify the code at lot!

By the way, it would be cool to get intmax_t and uintmax_t types in Python (C code). These types are more convenient than having to play with #ifdef or if (value < ..._MAX).
History
Date User Action Args
2016-09-06 00:42:25vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, benjamin.peterson, martin.panter
2016-09-06 00:42:25vstinnersetmessageid: <1473122545.43.0.438374635308.issue27961@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-09-06 00:42:25vstinnerlinkissue27961 messages
2016-09-06 00:42:25vstinnercreate