Author skip.montanaro
Recipients ashishnitinpatil, berker.peksag, lsowen, r.david.murray, rhettinger, skip.montanaro, vstinner, zach.ware
Date 2016-09-05.14:16:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CANc-5UwAOeHX6SFTwNC-avN1isM9C7zrBnvLdAkx9L+hKDFxUg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1473078685.57.0.260949361452.issue27497@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Also, a change in behavior has to be very carefully considered, even
though it passes all existing test cases (and presumably the one(s)
you'll add). The change may well only be acceptable for the next minor
release of 3.x.

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Berker Peksag <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Berker Peksag added the comment:
>
> Thanks! The patch lacks a test case (you can add it into Lib/test/test_csv.py) and a versionchanged notice in documentation (see http://cpython-devguide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/documenting.html#paragraph-level-markup for details.)
>
> ----------
> stage: needs patch -> patch review
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27497>
> _______________________________________
History
Date User Action Args
2016-09-05 14:16:22skip.montanarosetrecipients: + skip.montanaro, rhettinger, vstinner, r.david.murray, berker.peksag, zach.ware, ashishnitinpatil, lsowen
2016-09-05 14:16:22skip.montanarolinkissue27497 messages
2016-09-05 14:16:22skip.montanarocreate