This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients mark.dickinson, martin.panter, ned.deily, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2016-08-28.21:35:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
Tim Peters: "Victor, happy to add comments, but only if there's
sufficient interest in actually using this."

It looks like tests fail on some platforms. I guess that it depends on
the different factors: quality of the C math library, quality of the
IEEE 754 hardware implementation, etc.

I like the idea of providing an accurate and *portable* function
(_nth_root) thanks to the usage of the decimal module to get a better

If someone considers that the performance of
statistics.geometric_mean() matters, I suggest to document it. It's
new feature of Python 3.6, it's not like a regression, so it's ok.

What do you think?
Date User Action Args
2016-08-28 21:35:25vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, ned.deily, steven.daprano, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2016-08-28 21:35:25vstinnerlinkissue27761 messages
2016-08-28 21:35:25vstinnercreate