Message272451
Had some flooding (leaking pipes, rather values) issues to fix. Will
look at this asap.
On 04-Aug-16 10:58, Martin Panter wrote:
> Martin Panter added the comment:
>
> Okay, so to be clear, I am assuming XLC supports all of the following fields, and uses unsigned bit fields by default:
>
> struct UNSIGNED_BITS {
> unsigned int AU: 1;
> int A: 1; /* Equivalent to unsigned int */
> signed int AS: 1;
> unsigned short MU: 1;
> short M: 1; /* Equivalent to unsigned short; triggers warning */
> };
>
> and that it cannot compile the following:
>
> struct SIGNED_BITS {
> signed short MS: 1; /* Not supported */
> };
>
> Attached is what I think a patch to resolve this would look like. However it needs a line in Modules/_ctypes/_ctypes_test.c completed to detect the compiler:
>
> #ifndef /* Something to identify XLC */
>
> Can you figure out a way to test for XLC (but not GCC, which the AIX buildbot uses), and then try my patch out? Hopefully you see no more compiler warnings, test_ints() should now pass, and test_shorts() should be skipped.
>
> ----------
> keywords: +patch
> Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file44005/disable-signed-short.patch
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27643>
> _______________________________________ |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-08-11 14:50:32 | aixtools@gmail.com | set | recipients:
+ aixtools@gmail.com, martin.panter, Michael.Felt |
2016-08-11 14:50:32 | aixtools@gmail.com | link | issue27643 messages |
2016-08-11 14:50:31 | aixtools@gmail.com | create | |
|