This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients Phaqui, abarry, lucasem, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair
Date 2016-07-28.16:29:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1469723351.61.0.699348790236.issue27623@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I guess that would be the minimal change necessary to remove ambiguity. But I tend to think that

>>> (0).to_bytes(0, 'big', signed=True)

should also be an error. (And of course both these should still be errors with 'big' replaced with 'little'.)
History
Date User Action Args
2016-07-28 16:29:11mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, socketpair, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, abarry, lucasem, Phaqui
2016-07-28 16:29:11mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1469723351.61.0.699348790236.issue27623@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-07-28 16:29:11mark.dickinsonlinkissue27623 messages
2016-07-28 16:29:11mark.dickinsoncreate