➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients Jeffrey.Walton, alex, alexandre.vassalotti, christian.heimes, deadshort, dmalcolm, donmez, fweimer, gregory.p.smith, jcea, jwilk, loewis, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, matejcik, nnorwitz, pitrou, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, xiang.zhang, ztane
Date 2016-07-23.04:35:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1469248547.17.0.705402368367.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Apart from the empty “if” statement style (see review), tuple_and_list.patch looks good to me.

I understand the patches from 2011 and earlier have all been committed (correct me if I missed something).

Here is another patch fixing a 64-bit overflow in _thread, detected by the test_timeout() method in test_threading:
Modules/_threadmodule.c:59:17: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 6236628528058 + 9223372036000000000 cannot be represented in type 'long int'
History
Date User Action Args
2016-07-23 04:35:47martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, loewis, nnorwitz, gregory.p.smith, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, alexandre.vassalotti, donmez, matejcik, jwilk, alex, dmalcolm, python-dev, deadshort, serhiy.storchaka, ztane, fweimer, Jeffrey.Walton, xiang.zhang
2016-07-23 04:35:47martin.pantersetmessageid: <1469248547.17.0.705402368367.issue1621@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-07-23 04:35:47martin.panterlinkissue1621 messages
2016-07-23 04:35:45martin.pantercreate