Message 270536 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	orsenthil
Recipients	brett.cannon, gvanrossum, martin.panter, orsenthil, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2016-07-16.04:05:27
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1468641927.84.0.164849120938.issue27485@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I think that we use encourage everyone to use the higher level functions like urlparse() or urlsplit() and then get the .port from the named tuple result. Two things to do. 1. Update that Note the documentation which states a false statement that those helper functions are not exposed in urllib.parse 2. Raise a DeprecationWarning and rename them to _splitport()

I think that we use encourage everyone to use the higher level functions like urlparse() or urlsplit() and then get the .port from the named tuple result.

Two things to do.

1. Update that Note the documentation which states a false statement that those helper functions are not exposed in urllib.parse

2. Raise a DeprecationWarning and rename them to _splitport()

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-07-16 04:05:27	orsenthil	set	recipients: + orsenthil, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2016-07-16 04:05:27	orsenthil	set	messageid: <1468641927.84.0.164849120938.issue27485@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-07-16 04:05:27	orsenthil	link	issue27485 messages
2016-07-16 04:05:27	orsenthil	create