Message270089
> The purpose of the function was to determine the minimum libc compatibility requirements of the executable.
For what it's worth, I didn't know this, the pip authors obviously didn't know this, and after rereading the docs just now I still can't quite tell that this was intended. I'm not sure why one would want these semantics either, but at a minimum it would help to document the intended semantics much more clearly.
> parsing needs to be kept around as fallback solution
The point of the data I attached was that AFAICT there don't exist any currently-in-use, non-glibc systems where "parsing" returns a meaningful result. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-07-10 15:14:09 | njs | set | recipients:
+ njs, lemburg, Thomas.Waldmann |
2016-07-10 15:14:08 | njs | set | messageid: <1468163648.98.0.340719588523.issue26544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-07-10 15:14:08 | njs | link | issue26544 messages |
2016-07-10 15:14:08 | njs | create | |
|