Author gvanrossum
Recipients ebarry, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, martin.panter, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, ztane
Date 2016-06-27.15:00:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJLSRci3-e3Wp7kuqGTxC0E9v91eWSJfgbtReQGVf-6uaA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1467034116.35.0.41360797797.issue27364@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I think ultimately it has to become an error (otherwise I wouldn't
have agreed to the warning, silent or not). But because there's so
much 3rd party code that depends on it we indeed need to take
"several" releases before we go there.

Contacting the PyCQA folks would also be a great idea -- can anyone
volunteer to do so?
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-27 15:00:28gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, vstinner, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, ztane, ebarry
2016-06-27 15:00:28gvanrossumlinkissue27364 messages
2016-06-27 15:00:27gvanrossumcreate