Message269003
I don't think I explained the response very well, effectively the __json__ call would return an object which is JSON-serializable. This would include dict objects containing JSON-serializable objects albeit natively-supporting JSON serialisation or by means of subsequent obj.__json__ calls.
The reason I gave it __json__ is purely for easily-remembered implementation, separating it out from calls which may potentially clash with existing codebases, because let's face it, people don't often get to start again ;)
I'm not adverse to changing the method name at all, but I do believe this is a progressive way to go regarding JSON-serialization. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-21 14:47:30 | Daniel Ward | set | recipients:
+ Daniel Ward, steven.daprano, abarry, Ollie Ford |
2016-06-21 14:47:30 | Daniel Ward | set | messageid: <1466520450.91.0.458526850149.issue27362@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-21 14:47:30 | Daniel Ward | link | issue27362 messages |
2016-06-21 14:47:30 | Daniel Ward | create | |
|