Message 268900 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	martin.panter
Recipients	jstasiak, martin.panter, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2016-06-20.13:30:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1466429422.37.0.313751793779.issue26292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Here is a patch documenting that RawIOBase.writelines() is undefined for partial writes and blocking errors, as mentioned in (1) above. The alternative of requiring write() to be retried would IMO be unfair to existing writelines() implementations. It also seems out of place considering we don’t even have a RawIOBase.writeexactly() type of method.

Here is a patch documenting that RawIOBase.writelines() is undefined for partial writes and blocking errors, as mentioned in (1) above.

The alternative of requiring write() to be retried would IMO be unfair to existing writelines() implementations. It also seems out of place considering we don’t even have a RawIOBase.writeexactly() type of method.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-06-20 13:30:22	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, pitrou, vstinner, jstasiak
2016-06-20 13:30:22	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1466429422.37.0.313751793779.issue26292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-20 13:30:22	martin.panter	link	issue26292 messages
2016-06-20 13:30:21	martin.panter	create