Author barry
Recipients adrien-saladin, barry, berker.peksag, kxroberto, martin.panter, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger
Date 2016-06-13.05:28:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On Jun 12, 2016, at 09:19 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:

>Would you consider raising an exception at least for the case of a "To:"
>header or perhaps a warning or someother failsafe.

No, not for compat32 policy.  Seriously, I do not want to change the semantics
or syntax for existing code.  This API predates even the renaming and
stdlibbing of the email package from the older mimelib.

By all means, let's develop API alternatives for new code, or stricter RFC
compliance with defect registration for newer policies.  But please leave
things alone for compat32 and existing code.
Date User Action Args
2016-06-13 05:28:03barrysetrecipients: + barry, rhettinger, kxroberto, r.david.murray, adrien-saladin, python-dev, berker.peksag, martin.panter
2016-06-13 05:28:03barrylinkissue10839 messages
2016-06-13 05:28:03barrycreate