Message268163
> But I'll be happiest if nothing changes here (given that Guido ruled
> yesterday that Python's current urandom() implementation has to be
> reverted to once again match Linux's non-blocking urandom() behavior).
With urandom() behavior restored, can we close this? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-10 22:07:40 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner, christian.heimes, martin.panter, dstufft |
2016-06-10 22:07:40 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1465596460.62.0.631064042432.issue27272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-10 22:07:40 | rhettinger | link | issue27272 messages |
2016-06-10 22:07:40 | rhettinger | create | |
|