This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients christian.heimes, dstufft, martin.panter, rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2016-06-10.22:07:40
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1465596460.62.0.631064042432.issue27272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> But I'll be happiest if nothing changes here (given that Guido ruled
> yesterday that Python's current urandom() implementation has to be 
> reverted to once again match Linux's non-blocking urandom() behavior).

With urandom() behavior restored, can we close this?
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-10 22:07:40rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner, christian.heimes, martin.panter, dstufft
2016-06-10 22:07:40rhettingersetmessageid: <1465596460.62.0.631064042432.issue27272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-10 22:07:40rhettingerlinkissue27272 messages
2016-06-10 22:07:40rhettingercreate