Message268157
Gregory - I'm glad that you're willing to consider this again. It still is a constant issue for me, and .format with variable width fields in binary protocols is so the right tool for the job. If there is anything I can do to help get this added to 3.6 let me know. The forward/backward compatibility issue is secondary to me to the flexibility gained from having .format available for bytes.
Also padding with null bytes that don't get converted would be awesome. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-10 21:02:58 | underrun | set | recipients:
+ underrun, loewis, barry, brett.cannon, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, glyph, ezio.melotti, durin42, Arfrever, arjennienhuis, flox, ecir.hana, uau, tshepang, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, nlevitt@gmail.com, stendec |
2016-06-10 21:02:58 | underrun | set | messageid: <1465592578.63.0.934679629747.issue3982@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-10 21:02:58 | underrun | link | issue3982 messages |
2016-06-10 21:02:58 | underrun | create | |
|