➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author larry
Recipients Colm Buckley, Lukasa, alex, christian.heimes, doko, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane
Date 2016-06-07.18:46:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1465325182.51.0.564699591196.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
That reminds me.  I want to be clear: I think it's preferable that os.urandom() blocks when insufficient entropy is available.  If Victor's patch changed that, it should be backed out.

(Since non-blocking urandom is useful, perhaps in 3.6 os.urandom() should take a new "block=True" parameter.  But it's too late to add it for 3.5.)
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-07 18:46:22larrysetrecipients: + larry, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, vstinner, christian.heimes, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, dstufft, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley
2016-06-07 18:46:22larrysetmessageid: <1465325182.51.0.564699591196.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-07 18:46:22larrylinkissue26839 messages
2016-06-07 18:46:22larrycreate