This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author dstufft
Recipients Colm Buckley, Lukasa, alex, doko, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane
Date 2016-06-07.13:12:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1465305125.79.0.739599111796.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Since there's obviously contention about what the right answer here is, I suggest we should revert the patch (since the old behavior already exists in 3.5 and is shipped to thousands of people already, and status quo wins) and then continue the discussion about what to do further beyond that. At the very least, if something isn't decided prior to Larry cutting a release, then it should be reverted then.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-07 13:12:05dstufftsetrecipients: + dstufft, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, vstinner, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley
2016-06-07 13:12:05dstufftsetmessageid: <1465305125.79.0.739599111796.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-07 13:12:05dstufftlinkissue26839 messages
2016-06-07 13:12:05dstufftcreate