Message267643
To be clear, I don't have a problem adding ``os.urandom_info`` but I don't think that it solves the problem, we shouldn't force people to introspect ``os.urandom`` to figure out if CPython decided to make it less secure on this invocation or not. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | set | recipients:
+ dstufft, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, vstinner, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley |
2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | set | messageid: <1465301341.78.0.57631558945.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | link | issue26839 messages |
2016-06-07 12:09:01 | dstufft | create | |
|