This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author dstufft
Recipients Colm Buckley, Lukasa, alex, doko, dstufft, larry, lemburg, martin.panter, matejcik, ned.deily, python-dev, rhettinger, skrah, thomas-petazzoni, vstinner, ztane
Date 2016-06-07.12:09:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1465301341.78.0.57631558945.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
To be clear, I don't have a problem adding ``os.urandom_info`` but I don't think that it solves the problem, we shouldn't force people to introspect ``os.urandom`` to figure out if CPython decided to make it less secure on this invocation or not.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-07 12:09:01dstufftsetrecipients: + dstufft, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, vstinner, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, alex, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, Lukasa, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley
2016-06-07 12:09:01dstufftsetmessageid: <1465301341.78.0.57631558945.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-07 12:09:01dstufftlinkissue26839 messages
2016-06-07 12:09:01dstufftcreate