Message267617
Martin Panter (msg267511): "Maybe an alternative would be to add a special PYTHONHASHSEED=best-effort (or whatever) value that says if there is no entropy available, use a predictable hash seed. That would force whoever starts the Python process to be aware of the problem."
In my experience, it's better if users don't touch security :-) It's better if Python simply makes the best choices regarding to security. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-07 10:15:40 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, lemburg, rhettinger, doko, larry, matejcik, ned.deily, skrah, python-dev, martin.panter, ztane, thomas-petazzoni, Colm Buckley |
2016-06-07 10:15:40 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1465294540.67.0.112026096832.issue26839@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-07 10:15:40 | vstinner | link | issue26839 messages |
2016-06-07 10:15:40 | vstinner | create | |
|