Message 267142 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	tbeadle
Recipients	chris.jerdonek, docs@python, martin.panter, r.david.murray, rhettinger, tbeadle, terry.reedy
Date	2016-06-03.19:15:33
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1464981333.28.0.594082138719.issue15476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Using .. index:: object: code puts a 'code' entry under 'object' as well as 'object' under 'code'. That's the way it is for every other item that uses "object: XXX". So if you want a new 'code object' top-level item and keep 'object -> code', you're going to get 'code -> object' as well. It would seem to me that the 'code object' top-level item is redundant.

Using

.. index::
   object: code

puts a 'code' entry under 'object' as well as 'object' under 'code'.  That's the way it is for every other item that uses "object: XXX".  So if you want a new 'code object' top-level item and keep 'object -> code', you're going to get 'code -> object' as well.  It would seem to me that the 'code object' top-level item is redundant.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-06-03 19:15:33	tbeadle	set	recipients: + tbeadle, rhettinger, terry.reedy, r.david.murray, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, martin.panter
2016-06-03 19:15:33	tbeadle	set	messageid: <1464981333.28.0.594082138719.issue15476@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-03 19:15:33	tbeadle	link	issue15476 messages
2016-06-03 19:15:33	tbeadle	create