Author Susumu Koshiba
Recipients Susumu Koshiba, deronnax, martin.panter, spaceone
Date 2016-06-03.00:01:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1464912072.14.0.263239539505.issue25738@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Patched the behaviors when NO_CONTENT and RESET_CONTENT are sent via send_error(). According to RFCs, they aren't actually errors so sending them through send_response() seems to make the most sense, however.

send_error()'s behavior changes in this patch are:
 - Removed content-length field in the header for NO_CONTENT as per the RFC
 - Removed content-length field in the header for RESET_CONTENT also to comply with option c) mentioned in RFC7321 6.3.6
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-03 00:01:12Susumu Koshibasetrecipients: + Susumu Koshiba, martin.panter, deronnax, spaceone
2016-06-03 00:01:12Susumu Koshibasetmessageid: <1464912072.14.0.263239539505.issue25738@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-03 00:01:12Susumu Koshibalinkissue25738 messages
2016-06-03 00:01:12Susumu Koshibacreate