This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients Antony.Lee, ethan.furman, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2016-05-31.20:50:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Just because it isn't public doesn't mean no one calls it :).  But seriously, that's why I said "the risk".  Is the small benefit of the codechange worth the small risk of breaking something?  I'm not answering that question, I'm posing it.  Call me -0 on the change.

I agree that the optimization argument doesn't really seem relevant.  If someone cares about performance they aren't going to be using pathlib.
Date User Action Args
2016-05-31 20:50:33r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, pitrou, ethan.furman, serhiy.storchaka, Antony.Lee
2016-05-31 20:50:33r.david.murraysetmessageid: <>
2016-05-31 20:50:33r.david.murraylinkissue27161 messages
2016-05-31 20:50:33r.david.murraycreate