Message 266500 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	dholth
Recipients	Arfrever, dholth, jwilk, martin.panter, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date	2016-05-27.15:20:25
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1464362423.128281.620657449.7EE59825@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-reply-to	<1464355046.97317.620544801.06E58518@webmail.messagingengine.com>

Content
Then you prefer the older three year old patch that adds to pystate.h ? http://bugs.python.org/review/18373/#ps8545 I remember not being happy with how complicated it turned out, and perhaps having problems with not wanting the "warn once" behavior? It seems more Pythonic to store the flag in a dict.

Then you prefer the older three year old patch that adds to pystate.h ?
http://bugs.python.org/review/18373/#ps8545

I remember not being happy with how complicated it turned out, and
perhaps having problems with not wanting the "warn once" behavior? It
seems more Pythonic to store the flag in a dict.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-05-27 15:20:26	dholth	set	recipients: + dholth, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, Arfrever, r.david.murray, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2016-05-27 15:20:26	dholth	link	issue18373 messages
2016-05-27 15:20:25	dholth	create