Message266188
Heh. We could call it 'assertQuotientSetEqual', but most people would have to look that up (I did, to find it). 'assertEquivalenceClassesEqual' is a bit better, but probably still not clear without looking it up (or being a mathematician). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-05-23 21:29:50 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, georg.brandl, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, serhiy.storchaka, vitaly |
2016-05-23 21:29:50 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1464038990.73.0.669831146587.issue27071@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-05-23 21:29:50 | r.david.murray | link | issue27071 messages |
2016-05-23 21:29:50 | r.david.murray | create | |
|