Message266167
My first expectation for this function was assertUnorderedEqual, but I want to avoid problems with renaming (and coexisting of three names of for the same function), and I vote for status quo. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-05-23 17:19:36 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, vitaly |
2016-05-23 17:19:36 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1464023976.64.0.43263533578.issue27071@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-05-23 17:19:36 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue27071 messages |
2016-05-23 17:19:36 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|