Message265822
Here is a tested illustration of how I would suggest to manually handle encoding with check_output():
>>> text_input = "©"
>>> args = ("iconv", "--from-code", "ISO_8859-1", "--to-code", "UTF-8")
>>> bytes_output = check_output(args, input=text_input.encode("iso-8859-1"))
>>> bytes_output
b'\xc2\xa9'
>>> bytes_output.decode("utf-8")
'©'
If you wanted actual universal newline translation (which is more than plain text encoding), it would be more complicated, but still possible.
But I am not hugely against adding new “encoding” and “errors” parameters. The reasons against are that I don’t see it as necessary, and there are already a lot of subprocess-specific options to wade through. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-05-18 08:27:03 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, mark, eric.araujo, segfaulthunter, Arfrever, r.david.murray, srid, mightyiam, chris.jerdonek, berwin22 |
2016-05-18 08:27:03 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1463560023.44.0.844871707607.issue6135@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-05-18 08:27:03 | martin.panter | link | issue6135 messages |
2016-05-18 08:27:03 | martin.panter | create | |
|