This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rbcollins
Recipients rbcollins, yolanda.robla
Date 2016-05-12.04:54:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1463028869.57.0.772879478245.issue26807@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
./python Lib/unittest/test/testmock/testmock.py
..........................................s.....................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 80 tests in 0.180s

OK (skipped=1)


So thats great. I am going to have to stare that this quite hard to be sure I understand why it fails without the change away from 'for line in ' - but yes, this is the right place, and I'll commit it to 3.5 and 3.6 and backport it to the external mock tomorrow.

Thanks!
History
Date User Action Args
2016-05-12 04:54:29rbcollinssetrecipients: + rbcollins, yolanda.robla
2016-05-12 04:54:29rbcollinssetmessageid: <1463028869.57.0.772879478245.issue26807@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-05-12 04:54:29rbcollinslinkissue26807 messages
2016-05-12 04:54:29rbcollinscreate