This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, eric.araujo, ncoghlan, pitrou, rbcollins, rhettinger, scott_daniels, steven.daprano, tshepang, vstinner
Date 2016-05-12.04:49:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
The embedded side-effects were my main concern with Scott's original patch, so Steven's callback-based approach strikes me as a definite improvement. However, the awkwardness of the revised calling code in main does make me wonder whether or not this might be better implemented as a generator rather than as a function accepting a callback:

        results = list(t.autorange())
        return 1
    if verbose:
        for number, time_taken in results:
            msg = "{} loops -> {:.{}g} secs"
            print(msg.format(number, time_taken, precision))

(Originally I had the "if verbose: print" embedded in a direct loop over t.autorange(), but writing it that way made it immediately clear that the scope of the exception handler was too broad, so I changed it to extract all the results and only then print them)
Date User Action Args
2016-05-12 04:49:58ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, rhettinger, scott_daniels, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, rbcollins, eric.araujo, steven.daprano, asvetlov, tshepang
2016-05-12 04:49:58ncoghlansetmessageid: <>
2016-05-12 04:49:58ncoghlanlinkissue6422 messages
2016-05-12 04:49:58ncoghlancreate