Author pitrou
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, haypo, merwok, ncoghlan, pitrou, rbcollins, rhettinger, scott_daniels, steven.daprano, tshepang
Date 2016-05-11.15:50:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1462981820.5.0.727050230427.issue6422@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I would suggest making the 0.2 tunable as an optional argument. Different applications (benchmarks) may want different duration / precision tradeoffs.
I also notice the repeat functionality isn't included in the patch, is there a reason?
History
Date User Action Args
2016-05-11 15:50:20pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, scott_daniels, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, haypo, rbcollins, merwok, steven.daprano, asvetlov, tshepang
2016-05-11 15:50:20pitrousetmessageid: <1462981820.5.0.727050230427.issue6422@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-05-11 15:50:20pitroulinkissue6422 messages
2016-05-11 15:50:20pitroucreate