Message264935
I agree that what is currently in the docs is technically correct. The section on the power operator:
power ::= await ["**" u_expr]
should be read as:
power ::= (["await"] primary) ["**" u_expr]
just as the definition of 'u_expr' below should be read as:
u_expr ::= (await ["**" u_expr]) | "-" u_expr | "+" u_expr | "~" u_expr
and 'await' should be read as:
await ::= ["await"] (atom | attributeref | subscription | slicing | call)
Each definition builds upon previous ones.
However, it is confusing. Could a name other than "await" be used, since "await" is easily confused with the keyword await? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-05-06 04:45:44 | zach.ware | set | recipients:
+ zach.ware, docs@python, Yury.Selivanov, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, rjordens, Chema Cortés, Guido Treutwein |
2016-05-06 04:45:44 | zach.ware | set | messageid: <1462509944.3.0.95226144861.issue26156@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-05-06 04:45:44 | zach.ware | link | issue26156 messages |
2016-05-06 04:45:43 | zach.ware | create | |
|