Author gvanrossum
Recipients brett.cannon, francismb, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2016-05-02.18:43:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1462214621.69.0.68244567926.issue26219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm confused by the relationship between this and issue 26110. That seems to be a much simpler patch (which also doesn't apply cleanly). If 26110 really increases method calls by 20%, what does this add? (By which I mean (a) what additional optimizations does it have, and (b) what additional speedup does it have?)

I'm asking because I'm still trying to look for reasons why I should accept PEP 509, and this is brought up as a reason.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-05-02 18:43:41gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, francismb, yselivanov
2016-05-02 18:43:41gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1462214621.69.0.68244567926.issue26219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-05-02 18:43:41gvanrossumlinkissue26219 messages
2016-05-02 18:43:41gvanrossumcreate