Message263936
Seems sensible for itemgetter and attrgetter, where all but the first argument is nonsensical anyway.
It really seems like methodcaller should allow additional arguments (positional and keyword though), a la functools.partial (the difference being the support for duck-typed methods, where functools.partial only supports unbound methods for a specific type). I suppose #25454 disagrees, but it seems very strange how `methodcaller` is like `functools.partial`, but without call time argument binding, only definition time. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-04-21 22:15:03 | josh.r | set | recipients:
+ josh.r, serhiy.storchaka |
2016-04-21 22:15:03 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1461276903.6.0.819553999336.issue26822@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-04-21 22:15:03 | josh.r | link | issue26822 messages |
2016-04-21 22:15:03 | josh.r | create | |
|