Message263895
I suggest to remove the micro-optimization from Python 3.5 for safety.
I'm ok to experiment a new safer implementation on Python 3.6 ;-) We have more time to fix the code in Python 3.6 if new issues are found. Setting the tuple size to zero looks simple and safe, but the overall hack deserves a comment to explain:
* why you use a cached tuple
* why the reference count can be different than 2: recursive calls
* why do you change the tuple size |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-04-21 08:06:22 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, brett.cannon, rhettinger, ncoghlan, larry, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, random832, xiang.zhang |
2016-04-21 08:06:22 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1461225982.36.0.541231496411.issue26811@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-04-21 08:06:22 | vstinner | link | issue26811 messages |
2016-04-21 08:06:22 | vstinner | create | |
|