This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients Arfrever, dfarrell07, martin.panter, ned.deily, orsenthil, python-dev, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date 2016-04-03.07:15:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1459667723.26.0.933607216486.issue21069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I added a timeout because test_urllibnet fails with a timeout after 15 minutes on the ARM buildbot and other tests of the same file also use a timeout.

I tried but failed to reproduce the timeout.

I ran the test after my change and it passes so I considered that it was ok. I understand your rationale for timeout, non blocking socket and read() returning None.

Can we modify the test to use a selector to wait until the socket is ready and only read available bytes, rather than reading all data?

Using a local server would also avoid blocking too long (take less than 15 min).
History
Date User Action Args
2016-04-03 07:15:23vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, orsenthil, ned.deily, Arfrever, r.david.murray, python-dev, martin.panter, dfarrell07
2016-04-03 07:15:23vstinnersetmessageid: <1459667723.26.0.933607216486.issue21069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-04-03 07:15:23vstinnerlinkissue21069 messages
2016-04-03 07:15:22vstinnercreate