Message262785
Here is a patch implementing my ideas. Let me know what you think of the ideas and/or the patch :)
If people think this change is too much for 3.5, I could try making a more minimal patch that calls something like socket.getpeername() rather than read(). That should also avoid the non-blocking problem. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-04-02 02:00:48 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, orsenthil, vstinner, ned.deily, Arfrever, r.david.murray, python-dev, dfarrell07 |
2016-04-02 02:00:48 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1459562448.21.0.506793557956.issue21069@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-04-02 02:00:48 | martin.panter | link | issue21069 messages |
2016-04-02 02:00:47 | martin.panter | create | |
|