This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rbcollins
Recipients ezio.melotti, martin.panter, michael.foord, pitrou, r.david.murray, rbcollins, zach.ware
Date 2016-03-15.23:04:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1458083063.68.0.12820040616.issue25894@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The basic model is this:
 - a test can have a single outcome [yes, the api is ambiguous, but there it is]
 - subtests let you identify multiple variations of a single test (note the id tweak etc) and *may* be reported differently

We certainly must not report the test as a whole passing if any subtest did not pass.

Long term I want to remove the error/failure partitioning of exceptions; its not actually useful.

The summary for the test, when subtests are used, should probably enumerate the states.

test_foo (3 passed, 2 skipped, 1 failure)

in much the same way the run as a whole is enumerated.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-03-15 23:04:23rbcollinssetrecipients: + rbcollins, pitrou, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, martin.panter, zach.ware
2016-03-15 23:04:23rbcollinssetmessageid: <1458083063.68.0.12820040616.issue25894@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-03-15 23:04:23rbcollinslinkissue25894 messages
2016-03-15 23:04:23rbcollinscreate