Author belopolsky
Recipients SilentGhost, acucci, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, jerry.elmore, lemburg, martin.panter, matrixise, terry.reedy, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2016-03-01.22:09:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
I feel odd trying to advocate a POV that I disagree with, so let me just quote MAL:

In practice you often don't know the resolution of
the timing source. Nowadays, the reverse of what you said
is usually true: the source resolution is higher than the
precision you use to print it.

For full seconds, truncation will add an error of +/- 1 second,
whereas rounding only adds +/- 0.5 seconds. This is what convinced
me to use rounding instead of truncation.

I somehow missed this argument when Marc-Andre made it, so I want to make sure that it is properly considered before we finalize this issue.
Date User Action Args
2016-03-01 22:09:32belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, terry.reedy, vstinner, ezio.melotti, cvrebert, SilentGhost, berker.peksag, martin.panter, matrixise, jerry.elmore, acucci
2016-03-01 22:09:32belopolskysetmessageid: <>
2016-03-01 22:09:32belopolskylinkissue19475 messages
2016-03-01 22:09:32belopolskycreate