Author gvanrossum
Recipients SilentGhost, acucci, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, haypo, jerry.elmore, lemburg, martin.panter, matrixise, terry.reedy, tim.peters
Date 2016-03-01.21:48:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1456868887.46.0.837942668339.issue19475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Except for the case where you're closer than half a usec from the next value, IMO rounding makes no sense when suppressing digits. I most definitely would never want 9:59:59 to be rounded to 10:00 when suppressing seconds. If you really think there are use cases for that you could add a 'round=True' flag (as long as it defaults to False). That seems better than supporting rounding on datetime objects themselves. But I think you're just speculating.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-03-01 21:48:07gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, lemburg, tim.peters, terry.reedy, belopolsky, haypo, ezio.melotti, cvrebert, SilentGhost, berker.peksag, martin.panter, matrixise, jerry.elmore, acucci
2016-03-01 21:48:07gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1456868887.46.0.837942668339.issue19475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-03-01 21:48:07gvanrossumlinkissue19475 messages
2016-03-01 21:48:07gvanrossumcreate