Message 260661 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	eric.snow, mikekap, ncoghlan
Date	2016-02-22.08:29:24
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1456129764.55.0.719730080899.issue26388@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
This seems like a reasonable enhancement to me, but I'd appreciate your thoughts on how it might relate to a couple of other proposed ideas: * Supporting execution-by-module-name in pdb et al: https://bugs.python.org/issue9325 * Supporting configurable target environments for module execution: https://bugs.python.org/issue19982 My own current assessment is "this RFE neither helps nor hinders those other ideas", so this can also be read as an attempt to get a potential contributor with an interest in runpy to take a look at those long-languishing ideas to see if they pique your interest ;)

This seems like a reasonable enhancement to me, but I'd appreciate your thoughts on how it might relate to a couple of other proposed ideas:

* Supporting execution-by-module-name in pdb et al: https://bugs.python.org/issue9325
* Supporting configurable target environments for module execution: https://bugs.python.org/issue19982

My own current assessment is "this RFE neither helps nor hinders those other ideas", so this can also be read as an attempt to get a potential contributor with an interest in runpy to take a look at those long-languishing ideas to see if they pique your interest ;)

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-02-22 08:29:24	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, eric.snow, mikekap
2016-02-22 08:29:24	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1456129764.55.0.719730080899.issue26388@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-02-22 08:29:24	ncoghlan	link	issue26388 messages
2016-02-22 08:29:24	ncoghlan	create